Microsoft Communities
Posted By: Sarah Perez | Jan 22nd @ 8:30 AM

Metadata means "data about data" and every time you tag a photo, give it a star rating, or edit the time it was taken, you've edited the metadata. In Windows XP, photo metadata included things like file name, size, and type, etc. In Windows Vista, however, there is all kinds of new metadata, including tags, date taken, rating, caption, image resolution, camera make/model, shutter speed, etc. Now, some of that metadata is created by your camera (like make/model, shutter speed, etc), but some of it is created by you.

With the Windows Live Photo Gallery, you can quickly and easily add tags and ratings. If this is the first time you've installed the program, you will probably want to go through the pictures already on your computer and add some tags to them. This can be easily done by  clicking on the group of photos listed under the Tags section as "Not Tagged." You can then select a picture, or use Ctrl or Shift to select multiple photos and then "Add Tags" on the right side of the gallery. As you add tags to photos, your most recent tags will appear as you start typing in a tag, making it that much easier to tag a photo. The next time you import pictures, you can tag them on their way in - there are more details on the import process here.

In the Live Photo Gallery, you can also click on the star ratings, which are located above the tags in the right side column in the gallery to assign ratings to your photos. At the bottom right there is an option to add a caption to the selected photo.

But what you may not realize is that the tags you assign to your photos don't just help you locate and organize the pictures on your computer, the data is passed on to other services that support the metadata, too. A good example of this is flickr. By right-clicking on a photo or photos in the gallery, you'll see a "More Services" option. Click that and select "Publish on flickr." When you publish your photos on flickr, your tags and captions are supported and will be transferred automatically to Flickr, saving you from having to tag them again on the web service. But flickr isn't the only thing that supports the Photo Gallery Metadata. Since Windows Live Photo Gallery supports a type of metadata called XMP, programs like Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Bridge, iView MediaPro, Extensis Portfolio, and lots more support XMP, too.

Professional photographers may want to have even more interaction with the metadata, so for them, there is the Microsoft Photo Info tool. The tool is a software add-in for Windows that allows you to add, change, or delete metadata properties from inside Windows Explorer. It also provides enhanced "hover tips" and additional sort properties for digital photos in the Windows Explorer Details view.

Using the Microsoft Photo Info tool, you can edit images individually, or as a collection, quickly recall recent entries and location details, generate copyright notices automatically, correct EXIF capture date/time info, view EXIF properties, and preview images by double-clicking the photo's thumbnail.

(Source: Windows Live Photo & Video Blog)

Posted By: eisenworks | Feb 4th @ 11:29 AM
I just discovered that tagging is hierarchical in WLPG.  So, I can have a root tag called "Albums," if I wish, and sub-tags of Family, Vacations, etc.  This is a very powerful scheme.  So, Picasa's virtual albums are no longer missed...
Tags:
Posted By: eisenworks | Feb 4th @ 8:44 AM
I've only become aware of WLPG in the last couple of days, and it's hard to avoid doing a compare-and-contrast with Picasa.  The ease of modifying metadata is clearly far superior in WLPG, particularly when you're trying to do a first-time organization of lots of photos.  I like, for example, that you can simply click on and modify things -- even the filename -- in the right column.  If you change the taken-on date in Windows Photo Info, you run into a strange UI that I still haven't figured out, but here it's lickity-split quick.

I do miss not having Picasa's virtual albums.  Tagging can be used in much the same way, but the two models are not identical.  Having identifiable albums that don't have to be fished from a potentially long list of keywords is useful.  I suppose you need a database for that.  Does WLPG even have one?

I'm a bit lost on the idea that the new metadata fields are a property of Vista.  I can use WLPG and Microsoft Photo Info with XP and still get the same benefits, I think.  What am I missing?

I have recently done a screencast on Getting Control of your Digital Photos that is premised on the idea that, before using Picasa, you really need some other tools to provide a basic level of organization, e.g., find and co-locate your photos, correct taken-on dates, find duplicates, etc.  I would have taken a slightly different tack were I preparing users for WLPG...
Tags:
Posted By: catto | Jan 23rd @ 10:12 AM

Hey Now Sarah,

I like this post & this tool I was wondering if you know after editing a tag if there is a hot key for the save button? I find myself wishing there was a keyboard shortcut for that button since the user needs to click the save button after making meta tag adjustments.

Thx,

Catto

 

Tags:
Posted By: gcoupe | Jan 23rd @ 4:45 AM

Michael, I think you're being somewhat economical with the truth. WLPG is not a true superset of Vista Photo Gallery. The latter has the ability to be able to search by ratings. This feature is NOT in WLPG.

Also, the "publish to Flickr" feature of WLPG still has a bug, whereby the upload process maps the XMP Title/IPTC Object Name into Flickr's Description field - when what it should do is map the XMP Dublin Core Description field into Flickr's Description field.

And it would be really nice if I could use Microsoft's Photo Info directly within WLPG instead of doing a two-step shuffle out to Explorer every time... Either that or provide WLPG with full support for IPTC and IPTC4XMP. See http://gcoupe.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!6AA39937A982345B!4417.entry for more background.

But, apart from all that, WLPG is not bad at all!

Geoff Coupe

Tags:
Posted By: mfp2 | Jan 23rd @ 1:21 AM

Nice post, Sarah! 

quikboy, Windows Live Photo Gallery is a superset of Vista Photo Gallery.  In other words, it is an upgrade.... and better yet, its free!  http://photogallery.live.com

Michael Palermiti (PM, Photo Gallery team)

Tags:
Posted By: quikboy | Jan 22nd @ 6:52 PM

I got a question. Which is better? Vista Photo Gallery or Live Photo Gallery? Because I heard that each program has something the other program doesn't have. So which one really is better?

And I think Microsoft Photo Info. Tool should come standard. Shows at least Microsoft cares something about creativity programs.

Tags:

Page Navigation