<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:evnet="http://www.mscommunities.com/rssmodule/"><channel><title>Comment Feed for BlueTooth Fiber Optic Clothing....really? (laura on Channel 10)</title><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://on10.net/blogs/laura/bluetooth-fiber-optic-clothingreally/rss/default.aspx" /><description>BlueTooth Fiber Optic Clothing....really?</description><link>http://on10.net/blogs/laura/BlueTooth-Fiber-Optic-Clothingreally/</link><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:28:29 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:28:29 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>EvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3143.743, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)</generator><item><title>Re:</title><description>&lt;p&gt;As a vet, I don't see the military endorsing this...they are really edgy about "sensitive items" and to see companies trying to develop this into uniforms gives me pause.&amp;nbsp; I like the idea, in theory, but I don't see it realistically coming to fruition.&lt;/p&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://on10.net/blogs/laura/BlueTooth-Fiber-Optic-Clothingreally/?CommentID=18060</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:28:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">http://on10.net/blogs/laura/BlueTooth-Fiber-Optic-Clothingreally/?CommentID=18060</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://on10.net/18060/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>As a vet, I don't see the military endorsing this...they are really edgy about "sensitive items" and to see companies trying to develop this into uniforms gives me pause.&amp;nbsp; I like the idea, in theory, but I don't see it realistically coming to fruition.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>thekingster</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://on10.net/18060/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: BlueTooth Fiber Optic Clothing....really?</title><description>really nice, but just a temporary resolution until soldier nano technology gets on the field in my oppinion.&amp;nbsp;also very expensive considering the cameras would probably have to be mounted&amp;nbsp;on&amp;nbsp;aerial vehicles which would then do the surveilance (uav´s would be cheaper though), in addition to the clothing (for like 50k soldiers&amp;nbsp;thats a lot of fiber optics)&amp;nbsp;and the camera technology would have to be protected like fort knox because if some bad guy gets hold of it, he would be able to see enemy soldiers through walls... but the casual&amp;nbsp;clothing is definetely a total party hit. for mining safety purposes i think its ideal and miners surely would appreciate it. just for like daily wear you dont need a jacket that blinks green yellow or red to display&amp;nbsp;peoples vital status. if someone is having a heart attack i dont need a&amp;nbsp;yellow light on the persons jacket to realize there is something wrong.</description><comments></comments><link>http://on10.net/blogs/laura/BlueTooth-Fiber-Optic-Clothingreally/?CommentID=17997</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 13:33:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">http://on10.net/blogs/laura/BlueTooth-Fiber-Optic-Clothingreally/?CommentID=17997</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://on10.net/17997/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>really nice, but just a temporary resolution until soldier nano technology gets on the field in my oppinion.&amp;nbsp;also very expensive considering the cameras would probably have to be mounted&amp;nbsp;on&amp;nbsp;aerial vehicles which would then do the surveilance (uav´s would be cheaper though), in&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Googleman81</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://on10.net/17997/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: BlueTooth Fiber Optic Clothing....really?</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting technology - and good interview.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope your cold gets better, Laura.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://on10.net/blogs/laura/BlueTooth-Fiber-Optic-Clothingreally/?CommentID=17996</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:44:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">http://on10.net/blogs/laura/BlueTooth-Fiber-Optic-Clothingreally/?CommentID=17996</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://on10.net/17996/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Interesting technology - and good interview.
Hope your cold gets better, Laura.&amp;nbsp;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Bootstrap</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://on10.net/17996/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item></channel></rss>